Abstract：Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of recumbent position vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Methods: 722 cases of upper urinary tract lithiasis receiving percutaneous nephrolithotripsy were divided into prone position group (n=326) and recumbent position group (n=396). The operation time, operation blood loss, number of channels, operative complications, number of significant renal bleeding cases, hospital stay, number of delayed phase lithotripsy cases, and stone clearance rate were compared between two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the age, gender and complications between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). The operation time was shorter, the operation blood loss was less, and the stone clearance rate was higher in recumbent position group than in prone position group (P<0.05 for all). Conclusions: The recumbent position is better than prone position in operation time, operation blood loss, hospital stay and stone clearance rate.
柳懿鹏,章传华,袁敬东. 斜卧位与俯卧位B超引导下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的对比研究[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 4(4): 229-231.
Liu Yipeng, Zhang Chuanhua, Yuan Jindong. A comparative study of recumbent position vs. prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2015, 4(4): 229-231.
[1]谢光宇,付杰新,黄恒前,等.侧卧位经皮肾镜超声联合气压弹道碎石术治疗肾结石115例.广西医科大学学报,2010,28(4): 619-620. [2]Deibele AJ, Jennings LK, Tcheng JE, et al. Intracoronary eptifibatide bolus administration during percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute coronary syndromes with evaluation of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor occupancy and platelet function: the Intracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) Trial. Circulation, 2010,121(6): 784-791. [3]吴开俊.经皮肾镜取石术值得关注的问题.中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(10): 653- 655. [4]Valdivia Uria JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, et al. Comparing patient characteristics and outcomes between supine and prone positions in PCNL. Eur Urol Suppl, 2011,10(2): 69. [5]Resorlu B, Kara C, Oguz U, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal and staghorn stones in patients with solitary kidney. Urol Res, 2011,39(3):171-176
