Experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumorswith R.E.N.A.L. score ≥10
Wang Jie1 , Liang Xiaolong1 , Wu Zhenjie1 , Liu Jiayi1 , Shi Jiazi1 ,Wang Weiping1 , Bao Yi1 , Ye Huamao2 , Lyu Chen2 , Xu Chuanliang2 ,Sun Yinghao2 , He Yi3 , Liu Bing1 , Wang Linhui1
1.Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China; 2.Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University; 3Department of Urology, the First Hospital of Jiaxing
Abstract：Objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in treating renal tumors with R.E.N.A.L. score ≥10. Methods: All patients receiving RAPN by the same surgeon during May 2012 and Feb 2016 were reviewed. Among them, 38 patients with high complex renal tumors (R.E.N.A.L. score ≥10) were enrolled in this study. The male/female ratio was 26/12 with a mean age of 51.0±11.9 (19-72) years. The mean body mass index was 25.2±3.4 (19.6-35.2) kg/m2, and the mean ASA score was 1.91±1.03 (1 to 2). All tumors were solitary including 16 on the left and 22 on the right. The mean diameter was 4.27±2.27 (2-16) cm. There were 31 cases and 7 cases with R.E.N.A.L. score 10 points and 11 points respectively. The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 97.9±24.3 (69.8-131.4) mL·min-1·1.73 m-2. Results: All procedures were completed successfully except one conversion to open surgery for intraoperative bleeding. The mean operation time was 208.8±46.5 (105-308) min, ischemia time was 26.6±7.4 (14-49) min, and estimated blood loss was 150.3±115.5 (10-600) mL. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 14.4±3.6 (9-25) days. The overall rate of blood transfusion was 5.3% (2/38) and the complication rate was 7.9% (3/38). No positive surgical margin was observed. Postoperative pathology results revealed 32 renal clear cell carcinomas, 1 chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, 1 TFE-3 fusion gene related renal cell carcinoma renal cell carcinoma and 4 angiomyolipomas. The meane eGFR decreased by 7.1% three months after operation with a significant difference compared to preoperativee eGFR (P<0.004). All patients had no local recurrence or distant metastasis during a mean follow-up period of 27.8±9.7 (9-51) months. Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is safe and effective for high-complexity renal tumors with R.E.N.A.L. ≥10.
王杰，梁小龙，吴震杰，刘佳毅，时佳子，王卫平，鲍一，叶华茂，吕晨，许传亮，孙颖浩，何屹，刘冰，王林辉. 机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗高复杂性肾肿瘤(R.E.N.A.L.评分≥10分)经验总结[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 6(1): 8-13.
Wang Jie , Liang Xiaolong , Wu Zhenjie , Liu Jiayi , Shi Jiazi ,Wang Weiping , Bao Yi , Ye Huamao , Lyu Chen , Xu Chuanliang ,Sun Yinghao , He Yi , Liu Bing , Wang Linhui. Experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumorswith R.E.N.A.L. score ≥10. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2017, 6(1): 8-13.
[1]Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol, 2015,67(5):913-924. [2]Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol, 2009,182(4):1271-1279. [3]那彦群,叶章群,孙光.2014版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:4-16. [4]Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol, 2009,182(3):844-853. [5]Porpiglia F, Mari A, Bertolo R, et al. Partial nephrectomy in clinical T1b renal tumors: multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach (the RECORd project). Urology, 2016,89:45-51. [6]Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S, et al. Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int, 2015,116(3):407-414. [7]杨波,王林辉,王辉清,等.原位冰水降温保护下机器人辅助孤立肾保留肾单位手术的初步尝试. 第二军医大学学报,2013,34(9):1035-1037. [8]Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Mehrazin R, et al. Anatomic complexity quantitated by nephrometry score is associated with prolonged warm ischemia time during robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology, 2014,84(2):340-344. [9]White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7. Urology, 2011,77(4):809-813. [10]Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int, 2016.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13628/abstract;jsessionid=AECFFD6B35FD050E19524621E0A3F503.f04t02 [11]高宇,张旭.机器人肾部分切除术的应用现状和研究进展.微创泌尿外科杂志,2016,5(1):56-62. [12]Patton MW, Salevitz DA, Tyson MN, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses. J Robot Surg, 2016,10(1):27-31. [13]Minervini A, Ficarra V, Rocco F, et al. Simple enucleation is equivalent to traditional partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study. J Urol, 2011,185(5):1604-1610. [14]Wang Y, Ma X, Huang Q, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumours with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: peri-operative and oncological outcomes. BJU Int, 2016,117(1):126-130. [15]Long JA, Yakoubi R, Lee B, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol, 2012,61(6):1257-1262. [16]Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol, 2010,58(3):340-345. [17]Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, et al. "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy. J Urol, 2013,189(1):36-42. [18]Ramirez D, Caputo PA, Krishnan J, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush: step-by-step technique and matched comparison with warm ischaemia. BJU Int, 2016,117(3):531-536. [19]Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH, Allaf ME, et al. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology, 2013,81(3):573-579.
