Abstract：Surgical robotic techniques had been applied to a variety of urological procedures, and achieved favorable clinical efficacy. With advances in technology, a variety of new technologies were continuously employed in robot surgery platform, which provided a technical support to promote the development of robotic surgery and improve the surgical efficacy. In this review, we will summarize the progression and make a prospect of the robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, intraoperative ultrasonography and near infrared fluorescence imaging technology.
王东，刘竞. 机器人辅助腹腔镜新技术进展[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2017, 6(1): 4-7.
Wang Dong , Liu Jing. New advances in robot assisted laparoscopy. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2017, 6(1): 4-7.
[1]Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic singlesite and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: A critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol, 2011,59(1):26-45. [2]Gettman MT, White WM, Aron M, et al. Where do we really stand with less and notes. Eur Urol, 2011,59(2):231-234. [3]Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc, 2010,24(4):762-768. [4]White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol, 2010,58(4):544-550. [5]Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, et al. Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol, 2008,22(11):2575-2581. [6]Sawyer MD, Ponsky LE. Technical and equipment challenges for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int, 2010,106(6PtB):892-896. [7]Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol, 2011,59(1):26-45. [8]Haber GP, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. Eur Urol, 2012,61(2):415-422. [9]Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system:cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc, 2011,25(11):3566-3573. [10]Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, et al. Da Vinci single site surgical platform in clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot, 2016,12(4):724-734. [11]马鑫,张旭,董隽,等.机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜肾囊肿去顶减压术3例报告.微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(1):8-11. [12]Sun MR, Wagner AA, San Francisco IF, et al. Need for intraoperative ultrasound and surgical recommendation for partial nephrectomy: correlation with tumor imaging features and urologist practice patterns. Ultrasound Q, 2012,28(1):21-27. [13]Yakoubi R, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. Initial laboratory experience with a novel ultrasound probe for standard and single-port robotic kidney surgery:increasing console surgeon autonomy and minimizing instrument clashing. Int J Med Robot, 2012,8(2):201-205. [14]Kaczmarek BF, Sukumar S, Petros F, et al. Robotic ultrasound probe for tumor identification in robotic partial nephrectomy:Initial series and outcomes. Int J Urol, 2013,20(2):172-176. [15]Kaczmarek BF, Sukumar S, Kumar RK, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic ultrasound probes for robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2013,27(9):1137-1140. [16]时佳子,叶华茂,徐志鹏,等.专用超声在机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术中的应用初探.临床泌尿外科杂志,2016,31(1):29-31. [17]Ukimura O, Gill IS. Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:pictorial essay. J Urol, 2006,175(4):1311-1319. [18]Shoji S, Aron M, de Castro Abreu AL, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography with a surgeon-manipulated microtransducer during robotic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol, 2014,21(7):736-739. [19]Alenezi AN, Karim O. Role of intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)in robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgery. J Robot Surg, 2015,9(1):1-10. [20]Rao AR, Gray R, Mayer E, et al. Occlusion angiography using intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS):a novel technique demonstrating segmental renal blood supply to assist zero-ischaemia robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol, 2013,63 (5):913-919. [21]Angell JE, Khemees TA, Abaza R. Optimization of near infrared fluorescence tumor localization during robotic partial nephrectomy. J Urol, 2013,190(5):1668-1673. [22]Manny TB, Krane LS, Hemal AK. Indocyanine green cannot predict malignancy in partial nephrectomy:histopathologic correlation with fluorescence pattern in 100 patients. J Endourol, 2013,27(7):918-921. [23]Krane LS, Manny TB, Hemal AK. Is near infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green dye useful in robotic partial nephrectomy:a prospective comparative study of 94 patients. Urology, 2012,80(1):110-116. [24]Borofsky MS, Gill IS, Hemal AK, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging to facilitate super-selective arterial clamping during zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int, 2013,111(4):604-610. [25]Harke N, Schoen G, Schiefelbein F, et al. Selective clamping under the usage of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:a single-surgeon matched-pair study. World J Urol, 2014,32(5):1259-1265. [26]Kang SG, Schatloff O, Haidar AM. Does surgeon subjective nerve sparing score predict recovery time of erectile function following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? J Sex Med, 2015,12(6):1490-1496. [27]Manny TB, Patel M, Hemal AK. Fluorescence-enhanced robotic radical prostatectomy using real-time lymphangiography and tissue marking with percutaneous injection of unconjugated indocyanine green:the initial clinical experience in 50 patients. Eur Urol, 2014,65(6):1162-1168. [28]KleinJan GH, van den Berg NS, Brouwer OR, et al. Optimisation of fluorescence guidance during robot-assisted laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 2014,66(6):991-998.
