The comparison of curative effect between green laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate and traditional transurethral resection of the prostate
Ge Shenlin1, Zhu Jian1, Xie Lvzhong1
1Department of Urology,Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nantong,Jiangsu,226001,China
Abstract：Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy between green laser photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and traditional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods:From June 2012 up to now, 80 patients received PVP operation and 60 patients received TURP operation in our urology clinic department. Pre-operation general conditions, data of the operations and post-operation indexes including Qmax, post-void residual, IPSS were compared between two groups. Results:There were no significant statistic difference between pre-operation conditions in two groups (P＞0.05). The mean operation time, bladder irrigation time, catheterization time and post-operation hospitalization time were all significant statistic different between two groups (P＜0.05). One month and three months after operation, we evaluated the Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and found that these indexes were significantly improved compared to pre-operation. However, there were no significant statistic difference about these indexed between two groups after operation. Conclusions:PVP operation is superior in safety and as efficacious as TURP and will have a wide clinical applications in future.
葛沈林, 朱建, 解吕中. 绿激光选择性汽化术与传统电切术对前列腺增生的治疗效果比较[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(5): 340-343.
Ge Shenlin, Zhu Jian, Xie Lvzhong. The comparison of curative effect between green laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate and traditional transurethral resection of the prostate. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2013, 2(5): 340-343.
[1]Roehrborn C. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptom guidelines. Can Urol Assoc J, 2012,6(5 Suppl 2): S130-S132. [2]Bowen JM, Whelan JP, Hopkins RB, et al. Photoselective vaporiazation for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser,2013,3(2):1-34. [3]Gordon NS,Hadlow G,Knight E,et al. Transurethral resection of the prostate: still the gold standard. Aust N Z J Surg,1997,67(6):354-357. [4]Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U, et al. EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol,2012,61(4):783-795. [5]Woo H, Reich O, Bachmann A et al. Outcome of greenlight HPS 120-W laser therapy in specific patient populations: those in retention, on anticoagulants, and with large prostates (≧ 80 ml). EurUrol, (suppl) 7:378-383. [6]Tugcu V, Tasci AI, Sahin S,et al. Comparison of photoselective vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective nonrandomized bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up. J Endourol, 2008,22(7):1519-1525. [7]Malek RS, Kang HW, Coad JE, et al. Greenlight photoselective 120-watt 532-nm lithium triborate laser vaporization prostatectomy in living canines. J Endourol,2009,23(5):45. [8]Chen J, Wang M, Wang S, et al. 160-Watt lithium triboride laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of prostate: a prospective nonrandomized two-center trial. Urology, 2012,79(3): 650-654. [9]Teng J, Zhang D, Li Y, et al. Photoselective vaporization with the green light laser vs transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2013,111(2): 312-323. [10]Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, et al. Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology, 2008,71(2):247-251. [11]Tasci AI, Tugcu V, Sahin S, et al. Rapid communication: photoselective vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the large prostate: a prospective nonrandomized bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up. J Endourol, 2008,22(2):347-353. [12]Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP,et al. GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol,2010,58(3):349-355. [13]Stovsky MD, Griffiths RI, Duff SB. A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 2006, 176(4 Pt 1):1500-1506. [14]Bouchier-Hayes DM. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate--owards a new standard.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dise, 2007,10(2): S10-S14. [15]Shanchu Goh AC, Gonzalez RR. Photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy versus transurethral prostate resection: a cost analysis. J Urol,2010,183(4):1469-1473.
