激光剜除术在前列腺增生中的应用进展

doi:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2021.06.015

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (852 KB) RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要在良性前列腺增生（BPH）的腔内微创治疗方法中,经尿道前列腺切除术（TURP）一直被视为金标准。近20年来,各种基于激光能量平台的前列腺剜除术不断涌现,在临床实践中已被证明具有效率高、并发症少等优点,相较于TURP有更优异的安全性和临床疗效。因此研究者们普遍认为激光剜除术有望代替TURP成为BPH外科治疗的新标准。本文就近年来各种激光剜除术在前列腺增生中的应用进展作一综述。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	安子彦
	赵健
	符伟军
	张旭

关键词 ：前列腺增生, 激光, 剜除

Abstract：In the minimally invasive intracavitary treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）, the transurethral resection of the prostate （TURP） has always been regarded as the gold standard. In the past two decades, various enucleation procedures of prostate based on laser energy platform had emerged continuously, which had been proved to have the advantages of high efficiency and less complications in clinical practice. Compared with TURP, laser enucleation has better safety and clinical efficacy. So researchers generally believe that laser enucleation is expected to replace TURP to become the new standard for surgical treatment of BPH. This article reviews the application progress of various laser enucleation procedures in BPH in recent years.

Key words： benign prostate hyperplasia laser enucleation

收稿日期: 2021-05-30

通讯作者: 符伟军,fuweijun@hotmail.com

作者简介: ^△审校者

引用本文:

安子彦, 赵健, 符伟军, 张旭. 激光剜除术在前列腺增生中的应用进展[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 10(6): 424-429.
AN Ziyan, ZHAO Jian, FU Weijun, ZHANG Xu. Application advances of laser enucleation in benign prostatic hyperplasia. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2021, 10(6): 424-429.

链接本文:

http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract1728.shtml 或 http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2021/V10/I6/424

[1] AHYAI SA, GILLING P, KAPLAN SA, et al.Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol, 2010,58(3):384-397.
[2] FRAUNDORFER MR, GILLING PJ.Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol, 1998,33(1):69-72.
[3] HUANG SW, TSAI CY, TSENG CS, et al.Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia:systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ, 2019,367:l5919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5919.
[4] OELKE M, BACHMANN A, DESCAZEAUD AA, et al.EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol, 2013,64(1):118-140.
[5] FALLARA G, CAPOGROSSO P, SCHIFANO N, et al.Ten-year Follow-up Results After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Eur Urol Focus, 2021,7(3):612-617.
[6] 杨春光,唐焜,凌青,等.经尿道电切术和钬激光剜除治疗前列腺增生的荟萃分析.微创泌尿外科杂志,2020,9(1):50-55.
[7] CORNU JN, AHYAI S, BACHMANN A, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol, 2015,67(6):1066-1096.
[8] SUN I, YOO S, PARK J, et al.Quality of Life after photo-selective vaporization and holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate: 5-year outcomes. Sci Rep, 2019,9(1):16722.
[9] PENG L, ZHENG XN, WU JP, et al.Holmium laser technologies versus photoselective greenlight vaporization for patients with benign prostatichyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci, 2020,35(7):1441-1450.
[10] LARGE T, NOTTINGHAM C, STOUGHTON C, et al.Comparative study of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with Moses enabled pulsed laser modulation. Urology, 2020,136:196-201.
[11] NEVO A, FARAJ KS, CHENEY SM, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses 2. 0 vs non‐moses: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int, 2021,127(5):553-559.
[12] ZHENG X, PENG L, CAO D, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in benign prostate hyperplasia patients with or without oral antithrombotic drugs: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019,51(12):2127-2136.
[13] BOERI L, CAPOGROSSO P, VENTIMIGLIA E, et al.Clinical comparison of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in patients under either anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Eur Urol Focus, 2020,6(4):720-728.
[14] BECKER B, NETSCH C, HANSEN J, et al.Perioperative safety in patient under oral anticoagulation during Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol, 2019,33(3):219-224.
[15] 谷猛,刘冲,陈彦博,等.解剖标志导航钬激光剜除术治疗大体积前列腺增生的疗效分析.中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(3):206-209.
[16] ZELL MA, ABDUL-MUHSIN H, NAVARATNAM A, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for very large benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥ 200 cc). World J Urol, 2021,39(1):129-134.
[17] GILD P, DAHLEM R, POMPE RS, et al.Retrograde ejaculation after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)-Impact on sexual function and evaluation of patient bother using validated questionnaires. Andrology, 2020,8(6):1779-1786.
[18] SHAH HN, MAHAJAN AP, SODHA HS, et al.Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol, 2007,177(4):1468-1474.
[19] PLACER J, GELABERT-MAS A, VALLMANYA F, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology, 2009,73(5):1042-1048.
[20] KAMPANTAIS S, DIMOPOULOS P, TASLEEM A, et al.Assessing the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Urology, 2018,120:9-22.
[21] ELSHAL AM, NABEEH H, ELDEMERDASH Y, et al.Prospective assessment of learning curve of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a multidimensional approach. J Urol, 2017,197(4):1099-1107.
[22] BACH T, MUSCHTER R, SROKA R, et al.Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences. Eur Urol, 2012,61(2):317-325.
[23] HERRMANN T, BACH T, IMKAMP F, et al.Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuLEP):transurethral anatomical prostatectomy with laser support. Introduction of a novel technique for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol, 2010,28(1):45-51.
[24] XIAO KW, ZHOU L, HE Q, et al.Enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia Thulium laser versus Holmium laser: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci, 2019,34(4):815-826.
[25] ZHANG J, OU Z, ZHANG X, et al.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume prostates > 80 ml: 18-month follow-up results. World J Urol, 2020,38(6):1555-1562.
[26] ENIKEEV D, OKHUNOV Z, RAPOPORT L, et al.Novel Thulium fiber laser for enucleation of prostate: a retrospective comparison with open simple prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2019,33(1):16-21.
[27] ENIKEEV D, NETSCH C, RAPOPORT L, et al.Novel Thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol, 2019,26(12):1138-1143.
[28] CARMIGNANI L, BOZZINI G, MACCHI A, et al.Sexual outcome of patients undergoing Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Androl, 2015,17(5):802-806.
[29] BOZZINI G, BERTI L, MALTAGLIATI M, et al.Ejaculation-sparing Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP):outcomes on a large cohort. World J Urol, 2021,39(6):2029-2035.
[30] ENIKEEV D, GLYBOCHKO P, RAPOPORT L, et al.A randomized trial comparing the learning curve of 3 endoscopic enucleation techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH using mentoring Approach-Initial results. Urology, 2018,121:51-57.
[31] SAREDI G, PIROLA GM, PACCHETTI A, et al.Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate with the aid of a simulator tool but without tutoring: comparison of two surgeons with different levels of endoscopic experience. BMC Urol, 2015,15:49.doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0045-2.
[32] SANCHA GF, RIVERA VC, GEORGIEV G, et al.Common trend: move to enucleation—Is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol, 2015,33(4):539-547.
[33] MISRAI V, KEREVER S, PHE V, et al.Direct comparison of GreenLight laser XPS photoselective prostate vaporization and GreenLight laser En bloc enucleation of the prostate in enlarged glands greater than 80 ml: a study of 120 patients. J Urol, 2016,195(4 Pt 1):1027-1032.
[34] NGUYEN DD, MISRAÏ V, BACH T, et al.Operative time comparison of aquablation, greenlight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP. World J Urol, 2020,38(12):3227-3233.
[35] HUET R, PEYRONNET B, KHENE ZE, et al.Prospective assessment of the sexual function after greenlight endoscopic enucleation and greenlight 180W XPS photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Urology, 2019,131:184-189.
[36] 符伟军,王忠新,王春杨,等.经尿道绿激光分叶剜除汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生14例.海南医学,2016,27(10):1675-1677.
[37] PANTHIER F, PASQUIER J, BRUEL S, et al.En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases. World J Urol, 2020,38(6):1545-1553.
[38] PEYRONNET B, ROBERT G, COMAT V, et al.Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between GreenLight 532-nm and Holmium lasers. World J Urol, 2017,35(6):973-983.
[39] SEITZ M, RUSZAT R, BAYER T, et al.Ex vivo and in vivo investigations of the novel 1470nm diode laser for potential treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. Lasers Med Sci, 2009,24(3):419-423.
[40] WEZEL F, WENDT-NORDAHL G, HUCK N, et al.New alternatives for laser vaporization of the prostate:experimental evaluation of a 980,1318 and 1470nm diode laser device. World J Urol, 2010,28(2):181-186.
[41] LUSUARDI L, MITTERBERGER M, HRUBY S, et al.Update on the use of diode laser in the management of benign prostate obstruction in 2014. World J Urol, 2015,33(4):555-562.
[42] BUISAN O, SALADIE JM, RUIZ JM, et al.[Diode laser enucleation of the prostate (Dilep): technique and initial results]. Actas Urol Esp, 2011,35(1):37-41.
[43] HE GF, SHU Y, WANG BH, et al.Comparison of diode laser (980 nm) enucleation vs Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled trial with 12-Month Follow-Up. J Endourol, 2019,33(10):843-849.
[44] GANG W, HONG Z, CHAO L, et al.A comparative study of diode laser and plasmakinetic in transurethral enucleation of the prostate for treating large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 12-month follow-up. Lasers Med Sci, 2016,31(4):599-604.
[45] ZHANG J, WANG XL, ZHANG YB, et al.1470 nm diode laser enucleation vs plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized study. J Endourol, 2019,33(3):211-217.
[46] XIAO KW, ZHOU L, HE Q, et al.Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using a diode laser versus bipolar plasmakinetic for benign prostatic obstruction: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci, 2020,35(5):1159-1169.
[47] ZOU ZH, XU A, ZHENG SB, et al.Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results. World J Urol, 2018,36(7):1117-1126.
[48] SATTAR AA, NOËL JC, VANDERHAEGHEN JJ, et al. Prostate capsule: computerized morphometric analysis of its components. Urology, 1995,46(2):178-181.
[49] RUSZAT R, SEITZ M, WYLER SF, et al.Prospective single-centre comparison of 120-W diode-pumped solid-state high-intensity system laser vaporization of the prostate and 200-W high-intensive diode-laser ablation of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int, 2009,104(6):820-825.