经尿道160 W绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效观察

doi:10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2018.04.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (872 KB) RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的: 观察经尿道160 W绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗BPH的临床疗效及其并发症。方法: 选择62例BPH患者使用160 W绿激光侧出光纤行经尿道前列腺绿激光汽化术,观察患者的手术时间、术中出血量、手术前后血钠水平、术中术后并发症、术后膀胱冲洗时间、术后24 h的血降钙素原(PCT)水平、术后留置尿管时间、术后住院时间,术前及术后3、6个月、1年检测RUV、Q_max、IPSS及QOL评分。结果: 所有患者手术顺利,平均手术时间为(61.5±14.1)min;平均术中出血量为(15.5±2.7)ml;术后平均即刻血钠为(138.8±3.3)mmol/L,与术前相比差异无统计学意义(t=0.049,P=0.961>0.05);术中术后无前列腺电切综合征、输血、尿失禁、尿道狭窄并发症的发生,术后平均膀胱冲洗时间为(15.8±2.6)h;术后平均PCT为(0.37±0.09) μg/L;术后平均留置导尿时间为(2.9±0.5)d;术后平均住院时间为(4.1±0.8)d;出院1周后发生尿路感染21例,发生率为33.87%;术后3、6个月、1年随访RUV、Q_max、IPSS、QOL与术前比较均P<0.05。结论: 经尿道160 W绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗BPH安全、有效,并发症少,但术后尿路感染发生率高。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	冯瑞
	李中兴
	王星

关键词 ：绿激光, 良性前列腺增生症, 经尿道前列腺汽化术

Abstract：Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy and complications of 160 W green laser prostate vaporization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: Sixty-two cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated with 160 W green laser side-out fiber for transurethral vaporization of the prostate. The following parameters were observed: the operating time, intraoperative blood loss, blood sodium levels pre- and post-operationg, intraoperative and postoperative complications, bladder irrigation time, PCT level in 24 h after operation, postoperative indwelling catheter time, postoperative hospital stay, and RUV, Q_max, IPSS, QOL score before and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after operation. Results: All the operations were performed successfully. The mean operating time was (61.5±14.1) min, the mean intraoperative hemorrhagic volume was (15.5±2.7) mL, and the mean instant blood sodium was (138.8±3.3) mmol/L after operation, which showed no significant difference from those before operation. No prostatic electrotomy syndrome, blood transfusion, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture were found intraoperatively and postoperatively. The mean bladder irrigation time was (15.8±2.6) h after operation, the mean PCT was (0.37±0.09) μg/L after operation, the mean postoperative catheterization time was (2.9±0.5) days, the mean postoperative hospital stay was (4.1±0.8) days. There were 21 cases of urinary tract infection in 1 week after discharge, and the incidence rate was 33.87%. Before and 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after operation, there were significant differences in RUV, Q_max, IPSS, QOL score (P<0.05 for all). Conclusions: Application of 160 W green laser through the urethral prostate vaporization is effective in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the incidence of complications is low, but the incidence of urinary tract infection is high.

Key words： green laser benign prostatic hyperplasia photoselective vaporization of prostate

收稿日期: 2017-09-30

ZTFLH:

R697

通讯作者: 冯瑞,21641620@qq.com

引用本文:

冯瑞, 李中兴, 王星. 经尿道160 W绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生疗效观察[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 7(4): 258-262.
Feng Rui, Li Zhongxing, Wang Xing. Curative effect of 160 W PVP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2018, 7(4): 258-262.

链接本文:

http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract1432.shtml 或 http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2018/V7/I4/258

[1] 那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南(2014版).北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:245.
[2] Albisinni S, Aoun F, Roumeguère T, et al. New treatment strategies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the frail elderly population: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017,69(2):119-132.
[3] Yamada Y, Furusawa J, Sugimura Y, et al. Photo selective vaporization of the prostate: Long-Term outcomes and safety during 10 years of Follow-Up. J Endourol, 2016,30(12):1306-1311.
[4] Gu X, Strom K, Spaliviero M, et al. Does prostate configuration affect the efficacy and safety of GreenLight HPS TM laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP)? Lasers Med Sci, 2013,28(2):473-478.
[5] Elshal AM, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM. Transurethral laser surgery for benign prostate hyperplasia in octogenarians: safey and outcome. Urology, 2013,81(3):634-639.
[6] Muir G, Klecka J, Culkin DJ, et al. Comparison of GreenLight laser and transurethral resection of the prostate baseline characteristics and outcomes: lessons learned from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society GreenLight Laser Study. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017,69(3):285-292.
[7] Meskawi M, Hueber PA, Valdivieso R, et al. Multicenter international experience of 532 nm-laser photo-vaporization with Greenlight XPS in men with large prostates (prostate volume>100 cc). World J Urol, 2017,35(10):1603-1609.
[8] 盛明雄,万玲玲,刘昌明.经尿道选择性绿激光汽化术与经尿道等离子电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较.实用医学杂志,2016,32(23):3890-3893.
[9] 沈善林,徐忠华,刘殿成,等.经尿道高功率绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗高危良性前列腺增生症效果观察.山东医药,2017,57(6):90-92.
[10] 刘刚,杨国胜.经尿道直出绿激光推铲式汽切术与双极等离子电切术治疗高龄高危BPH的对比研究.临床泌尿外科杂志,2016,31(6):501-504.
[11] 谢立平,陈弘.前列腺增生腔内剜除手术方法探讨.临床泌尿外科杂志,2016,31(6):489-492.
[12] 余克勤,李海博,单玉喜,等.选择性绿激光汽化术治疗高危复发性良性前列腺增生.中华男科学杂志,2015,21(6):573-575.
[13] Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, et al. A European multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing 180W Green Light XPS laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 12-month results of the Goliath study. J Urol, 2015,193(2):570-578.
[14] 王健,贾卓敏,艾星,等.160W绿激光治疗大体积前列腺增生的疗效分析.微创泌尿外科杂志,2015,4(5):298-301.
[15] Pradere B, Peyronnet B, Leonard G, et al. Greenlight( ® ) photoselective vaporization of the prostate: Contemporary practices in France. Prog Urol, 2016,26(3):168-175.
[16] 董淑英,夏海波,包国昌,等.196例高危良性前列腺增生症患者医院感染临床分析.中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(17):3749-3750.
[17] 孟元,卫中庆,熊红兵,等.良性前列腺增生伴组织学炎症与PSA异常升高的相关性.江苏医药,2013,39(17):2016-2018.
[18] Kang DH, Cho KS, Ham WS, et al. A systematic review and Meta-Analysis of functional outcomes and complications following the photoselective vaporization of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Mens Health, 2016,34(2):110-122.