Abstract：Robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy was developed in recent years. Compared with transperitoneal approach, retroperitoneal approach is more suitable for the patients with peritonitis or abdominal surgery history. It is also easier to manage the posterior or upper pole renal masses via retroperitoneal approach, for renal artery can be dissected and exposed more directly without increasing injury risk of intestines, liver, spleen and other abdominal organs, which can significantly shorten operative time. Due to combination of the advantages of retroperitoneal approach and robotic system, robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy has been incresingly reported in recent five years. With accumulation of the surgical experience, robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy will be the preferred surgical approach for posterior or upper pole renal masses.
[1]Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, et al. Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol, 2000,163(3):730-736. [2]Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 2011,59(4):543-552. [3]Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Lund GO, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience and comparison to the open surgical approach. J Urol, 1995,153(5):1409-1414. [4]Rogers C, Sukumar S, Gill IS. Robotic partial nephrectomy: the real benefit. Curr Opin Urol, 2011,21(1):60-64. [5]Fan X, Xu K, Lin T, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2013,111(4):611-621. [6]Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with Da Vinci robotic system. Urology, 2004,64(5):914-918. [7]Patel MN, Kaul SA, Laungani R, et al. Retroperitoneal robotic renal surgery: Technique and early results. J Robot Surg, 2009,3(1):1-5. [8]Weizer AZ, Palella GV, Montgomery JS, et al. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: technique and perioperative results. J Endourol, 2011,25(4):553-557. [9]Guttilla A, Crestani A, Zattoni F, et al. Combined robotic-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy and extraperitoneal prostatectomy. First case reported. Urologia, 2012,79(1):62-64. [10]Feliciano J, Stifelman M. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach. JSLS, 2012,16(2):208-211. [11]Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol, 2013,27(7):869-874. [12]Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Furukawa J, et al. Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan. J Endourol, 2013,27(11):1384-1388. [13]Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol, 2014,32(6):1523-1529. [14]Gin GE, Maschino AC, Spaliviero M, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor complexity. Urology, 2014,84(6):1355-1360. [15]Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, et al. Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Renal Masses Is Associated with Earlier Hospital Discharge: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison. J Endourol, 2015,29(10):1137-1142. [16]Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol, 2014,66(3):542-549. [17]刘宇保,俞能旺,宋华,等.经后腹腔途径行机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的比较研究.微创泌尿外科杂志, 2014,3(5):274-276. [18]黄双,吕香君,张旭.机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾部分切除术.微创泌尿外科杂志,2015,4(3):129-132. [19]汤昊,张征宇,周文泉,等.经腹与腹膜后入路机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗早期肾癌的比较.临床肿瘤学杂志,2015,20(12):1128-1131. [20]周骏,梁朝朝,王建忠,等.腹膜外入路Da Vinci机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术(附12例报告).中华腔镜外科杂志,2015,8(4):260-263. [21]王共先,傅斌,刘伟鹏,等.经腹膜后入路机器人手术治疗肾肿瘤的技术与经验的探讨(附45例报告).临床泌尿外科杂志,2016,31(1):19-23. [22]Crisan N, Neiculescu C, Matei DV, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal approach - a new technique for the upper urinary tract and adrenal gland. Int J Med Robot, 2013,9(4):492-496. [23]Patel M, Porter J. Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. World J Urol, 2013,31(6):1377-1382. [24]Benway BM, Bhayani SB. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evolution and recent advances. Curr Opin Urol, 2010,20(2):119-124. [25]Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. J Urol, 2008,180(4):1279-1283. [26]Ani I, Finelli A, Alibhai SM, et al. Prevalence and impact on survival of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. BJU Int, 2013,111(8):E300-305. [27]Shah PH, Moreira DM, Okhunov Z, et al. Positive Surgical Margins Increase Risk of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for High-Risk Renal Tumors. J Urol. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534716003529, 2016-2-19. [28]Maurice MJ, Zhu H, Kim SP, et al. Reexamining the Association Between Positive Surgical Margins and Survival After Partial Nephrectomy in a Large American cohort. J Endourol. http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2016.0031,2016-2-18. [29]Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol, 2007,178(1):41-46. [30]Patard JJ, Pantuck AJ, Crepel M, et al. Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication. Eur Urol, 2007,52(1):148-154. [31]Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology, 2011,77(1):109-113. [32]Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol, 2005,174(3):846-849. [33]Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med, 2010,363(8):701-704. [34]Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol, 2009,23(1):115-121. [35]Naeem N, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Endourol, 2011,25(1):101-105. [36]Anast JW, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al. Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy. J Urol, 2004,172(6 Pt 1):2287-2291. [37]Doublet J, Belair G. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective in obese patients: a comparative study of 55 procedures. Urology, 2000,56(1):63-66. [38]Berglund RK, Gill IS, Babineau D, et al. A prospective comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in the extremely obese patient. BJU Int, 2007,99(4):871-874.
