经腹膜外途径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术5年疗效分析
杨国强1 , 宋涛1 , 张旭1 , 丁强1 , 马鑫1 , 李宏召1 , 孙圣坤1 , 郭刚1 , 王保军1 , 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫1
1 中国人民解放军总医院泌尿外科 100853 北京
Efficacy analysis of extra-peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for 5 years
Yang Guoqiang1 , Song Tao1 , Zhang Xu1 , Ding Qiang1 , Ma Xin1 , Li Hongzhao1 , Sun Shengkun1 , Guo Gang1 , Wang Baojun1 , Waslijiang·Wahafu1
1 Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
摘要 目的: 探讨经腹膜外途径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(eLRP)治疗前列腺癌的临床疗效和应用价值。方法: 对2008年2月~2013年1月由同一术者实施eLRP的256例前列腺癌患者围手术期资料以及术后随访情况对比分析。结果: 256例手术均获成功,无中转开放手术病例。手术时间平均108 min;术中出血量平均136 ml;术中输血15例(5.9%);术后引流时间平均4 d;拔除尿管时间平均13 d;术后住院时间平均9 d。1例术中大出血,1例出现直肠损伤,2例术后尿道狭窄,36例术后出现尿外渗(14.1%), 34例(13.3%)术后每天使用尿垫超过4块。术后切缘阳性率 19.10%。97例高危患者术中行改良盆腔淋巴结清扫,术后39例生化复发(15.2%),性功能恢复206例(80.5%)。结论: eLRP是安全、可行和有效的治疗局限性前列腺癌的方法之一。可避免对腹腔脏器的干扰,缩短患者恢复时间,降低手术并发症。术前对局部进展性前列腺癌进行新辅助内分泌治疗可以为根治性切除肿瘤提供有效帮助,在一定时期内,eLRP仍是治疗局限性前列腺癌的主要微创手段。
关键词 :
根治性前列腺切除术 ,
腹腔镜 ,
腹膜外途径
Abstract :Objective: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of Extra-peritoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (eLRP). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the complete clinical and follow-up data of 256 cases with prostate cancer who undergone eLRP by the same performer from February 2008 to January 2013 in The People's Liberation Army General Hospital. Results: All 256 cases received successful operation. Average operative time was 108 min with an estimated blood loss of 136 ml. 15 cases needed transfusion in operation. The drain was removed on postoperative day 4 and The foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 13. the Average postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. 1 case of intraoperative bleeding, 1 case sustained rectal injury, 2 cases developed anastomotic stricture, 36 cases were found urinary leakage, 34 cases of postoperative urine pad used more than 4 pieces every day, The positive surgical margin rate was 19.10%. Pelvic lymph node dissection was introduced to 97 high-risk cases. The potency rate was 80.5%. Biochemical recurrence rate was 15.2%. Conclusions: Extra-peritoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy is safe and reliable, which can reduce the surgical complications and have the advantage of shorter hospitalization and less blood loss. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy remains a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer over a period of time.
Key words :
radical prostatectomy
laparoscopy
extraperitoneal approach
收稿日期: 2013-06-01
通讯作者:
张旭,xzhang@foxmail.com
引用本文:
杨国强, 宋涛, 张旭, 丁强, 马鑫, 李宏召, 孙圣坤, 郭刚, 王保军, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫. 经腹膜外途径腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术5年疗效分析[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(4): 253-255.
Yang Guoqiang, Song Tao, Zhang Xu, Ding Qiang, Ma Xin, Li Hongzhao, Sun Shengkun, Guo Gang, Wang Baojun, Waslijiang·Wahafu. Efficacy analysis of extra-peritoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for 5 years. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2013, 2(4): 253-255.
链接本文:
http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract1038.shtml 或 http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2013/V2/I4/253
[1]那彦群. 中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011: 54. [2]张旭,李宏召,马鑫,等.泌尿外科腹腔镜手术学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:126-132. [3]Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol, 2004,171(3):1212-1215. [4]刘定益,夏维木.前列腺癌外科治疗的新进展. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2010,15(4):241-244. [5]Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology,1997,50(6):854-857. [6]Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol, 2006,49(1):113-119. [7]Rozet F, Arroyo C, Cathelineau X, et al. Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2004,18(7):605-609; discussion 609-610. [8]Greco F, Hoda MR, Wagner S, et al. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients. BJU Int, 2011,108(4):583-587. [9]Phinthusophon K,Nualyong C, Srinualnad S, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Med Assoc Thai,2007,90(12):2644-2650. [10]Touijer K, Secin FP, Cronin AM, et al. Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience. Eur Urol, 2009,55(5):1014-10149. [11]Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2013,63(4):606-614.
[1]
靳永胜, 东冰, 贾军琪, 张培波, 李义, 汪峰, 张斌斌, 贺晓龙, 宋红雄, 高继学. 经腹膜外入路和经腹腔入路腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的效果对比 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(2): 120-124.
[2]
解俊杰, 石炳毅, 李钢, 范宇, 刘炎忠, 罗用文, 杨锦涛, 李超, 齐宝玉, 柏宏伟. 程序优化下后腹腔镜左侧活体供肾切取术238例总结 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(1): 6-11.
[3]
王强, 王保军, 王云鹏, 刘志佳, 徐俊楠, 唐宇哲, 张旭. T2a 期局限性肾癌患者临床、病理特征描述及肿瘤转移影响因素分析 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(1): 12-18.
[4]
吴振起, 巩会杰, 时京, 冯营营, 高文锋, 李琰峰, 吴雅冰, 马雪涛, 刘景波, 戴林枫, 段珺耀, 闫永吉. 腹腔镜黏膜下隧道法联合腰大肌悬吊输尿管膀胱再植术(附22例报道) [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(1): 35-38.
[5]
邢伟阳, 林光正, 张志强, 张志辉, 洪谦, 田齐星, 叶青林, 于德新, 谢栋栋. 腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术在寡转移前列腺癌中应用的临床疗效与安全性分析 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(1): 44-49.
[6]
凌强, 蓝建华, 杨海. 保留肾单位手术治疗肾肿瘤的疗效及对患者血清皮质醇、uPA、VEGF和T细胞亚群的影响 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 9(1): 23-26.
[7]
李刚, 蒲永昌, 刘林海. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿控影响因素分析 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(6): 385-389.
[8]
徐博文, 张桐桐, 薛春源, 申业壮, 张凯玥, 曲思凤, 智绪亭. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后耻骨上引流与尿道引流对比的meta分析 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(6): 390-398.
[9]
于小平, 阮东丽, 杨艳, 赵雪利. 腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治性切除的回顾分析 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(6): 380-384.
[10]
刘立民, 迟庆龙, 戴小凡, 张尧, 王超, 张守利. 腹腔镜与显微镜精索静脉结扎术的疗效比较 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(6): 421-423.
[11]
李云飞, 龚云, 张少峰, 甘伟, 张正龙, 季辉华, 陈胜, 王天宝, 刘云. 后腹腔镜半肾切除术治疗重复肾关键性技术探讨 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(5): 294-297.
[12]
靳永胜, 东冰, 贾军琪, 汪峰, 张培波, 李义, 高继学. 经腹腹腔镜下巨大肾上腺肿瘤程序化解剖性切除术临床效果分析(附21例报告) [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(5): 289-293.
[13]
谢赞兵, 李子祺, 黄冠银. B超引导下经皮肾镜双通道与腹腔镜下肾囊肿去顶术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的比较研究 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(5): 298-302.
[14]
朱德胜, 吴海啸, 徐旻, 吴汉, 杨庆, 马敏, 张旭, 徐丹枫, 吕光宏, 李颖如. 腹腔镜技术联合会阴小切口在复杂性后尿道狭窄中的应用探讨 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(4): 217-221.
[15]
赵鉴明, 范阳, 孙圣坤, 祖强, 陈欣, 黄双, 祝强, 张磊, 王云鹏, 周启玮, 张旭, 董隽. 机器人辅助腹腔镜完全腹膜外化异体肾移植术(附3例报告) [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(4): 222-225.