注册 登录 联系我们  
微创泌尿外科杂志  2013, Vol. 2 Issue (2): 131-133    
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经尿道980 nm红激光前列腺汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症
陈光富1, 郭刚1, 张旭1
1中国人民解放军总医院泌尿外科 100853 北京
980 nm diode laser technology for vaporization of the prostate
Chen Guangfu1, Guo Gang1, Zhang Xu1
1Department of Urology, Chinese PLA Genral Hospital, 100853, China
全文: PDF (831 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的:评价经尿道980 nm红激光前列腺汽化切除术治疗BPH的有效性及安全性。方法:2010年6月~2011年12月,对24例经超声测得前列腺体积平均(68±18) ml的BPH患者行经尿道红激光前列腺汽化切除术,观察记录手术时间、术中出血量,术中灌注液体总量、术后留置尿管时间、手术并发症,记录手术前后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)及剩余尿量(PVR)等指标,并与同期34例接受经尿道前列腺等离子电切术的前列腺增生患者的数据比较。结果:58例患者手术均获成功,激光组手术时间平均(75.2±28.5) min,术中平均出血量(10.1±3.2)ml,无输血病例;术后灌注液体总量平均(14.1±2.5)L。术后平均留置尿管时间(4.1±0.7)d。术后随访 4~18个月,术后3个月复查IPSS评分由术前平均(22.7±4.7)下降至(9.2±1.5)分,Qmax 由术前 (6.5±2.7)ml/s 增加至术后(18.3±3.3)ml/s,PVR 由术前(63.6±10.2)ml下降至术后(25.9±6.7)ml,手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。与等离子电切组对比,红激光组在术中出血量及术中灌注液体总量方面显著少于等离子电切组,手术时间长于等离子电切组,而其他指标差异无统计学意义。24例术前仍保持性功能者,术后均保留性功能。术后无尿失禁发生。结论:经尿道红激光汽化切除术治疗BPH安全有效,尤其适合于高龄、高危患者,但其长远疗效还需进一步观察。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈光富
郭刚
张旭
关键词 前列腺增生 激光 前列腺电切术    
AbstractObjective:We prospectively evaluated vaporization efficiency of the high power, 980 nm diode laser for bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods:A total of 24 consecutive patients recruited in the study between June 2010 and December 2011. The average age was (71.6±3.7) years(57-83 years).The average prostate volume was (68±18) ml (45-105 ml).Patients with a history of neurogenic voiding dysfunction, chronic prostatitis, or prostate or bladder cancer were excluded from analysis. Preoperative maximal flow rate, post-void residual urine, International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life were compared with values at 3 months. Operation time, bleeding volume, perfusion fluid volume, catheterization time and complications were assessed. Another 34 patients received transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate. Data of two groups was studied.Results:Mean operation time of 980 nm laser group was (75.2±28.5) minS, the mean bleeding volume was (10.1±3.2) ml, mean perfusion fluid volume postoperation was (14.1±2.5)L, and catheterization time was (4.1±0.7) days. 4 to 18 months follow-up was performed. Comparing to the 3 months after operation, IPSS score, QOL score, Qmax and PVR had significant improvement(P<0.01).The resection time was longer for 980 nm laser group than PKRP,but the inter-operative bleeding was less in 980nm laser group than PKRP. IPSS, QOL and Qmax were significantly improved after both of the procedures(P<0.05).Conclusions:980-nm Diode laser vaporesection has the same therapeutic effect as PKRP and less side effects than PKRP. It is a new technology in treatment of symptomatic BPH.
Key wordsbenign prostatic hyperplasia    laser    prostatectomy
收稿日期: 2013-01-06     
ZTFLH:  R697  
通讯作者: 张旭,xuzhang@foxmail.com   
引用本文:   
陈光富, 郭刚, 张旭. 经尿道980 nm红激光前列腺汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(2): 131-133.
Chen Guangfu, Guo Gang, Zhang Xu. 980 nm diode laser technology for vaporization of the prostate. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2013, 2(2): 131-133.
链接本文:  
http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract997.shtml     或     http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2013/V2/I2/131
京ICP备14007602 版权所有 © 微创泌尿外科杂志 地址:北京市复兴路28号 邮编:100853
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn