Abstract：Objective:To compare the time of two different urethrovesical anastomosis methods in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).Methods:Between September 2011 and March 2012, LRP was performed in 21 patients with prostate cancer, in the urethrovesical anastomosis, interrupted suture was used in 13 patients, and running suture was used in the rest. By using knot pusher in interrupted suture, urethra and vesical neck was anastomosed at 6, 3, 9, 12 o'clock respectively.Results:All operations were successfully completed laparoscopically without transversion to open approach. The mean operating time for interrupted suture was 19.9 min(range from 12 to 30 min), while the time for running suture was 34 min (range from 21-57 min).Conclusions: Interrupted suture method can shorten the operation time in urethrovesical anastomosis.
庄君龙, 连惠波, 郭宏骞. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中两种吻合方法时间的比较[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(2): 114-116.
Zhuang Junlong, Lian Huibo, Guo Hongqian. The comparison of the time of two different urethrovesical anastomosis methods in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2013, 2(2): 114-116.
[1]Lein M, Stibane I, Mansour R, et al. Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte. Eur Urol, 2006, 50: 1278-1282; discussion 1283-1274. [2]Branco AW, Kondo W, de Camargo AH, et al. Laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis with posterior fixation. Urology, 2007, 70: 799-802. [3]Yin M, Yang XQ, Li RB, et al. [Technique of running urethrovesical anastomosis during radical laparoscopic prostatectomy: separate application of two needles]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2010, 90(28): 1955-1957. [4]Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology, 2003, 61: 699-702.
