Abstract：Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) in Europe and the United States has been widely carried out nowadays. And as domestic robot-assisted surgical operations become more widespread, the number of surgical cases of RALP is also increasing. What's more, RALP has become the preferred choice for patients with prostate cancer in some large medical centers. RALP was divided into transabdominal and retroperitoneal procedures. However, with the continuous progresses in technology and the understanding of the local anatomy, it changes. On the basis of the further development, the different types of surgical approaches were gradually reported. In this paper, a variety of the surgical approaches and development of RALP are reviewed.
[1]Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol, 2012,61(6):1079-1092. [2]韩苏军,张思维,陈万青,等.中国前列腺癌发病现状和流行趋势分析.临床肿瘤学杂志,2013,18(4):330-334. [3]Schuessler WW, Vancaillie TG, Reich H, et al. Transperitoneal endosurgical lymphadenectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. J Urol, 1991,145(5):988-991. [4]Sriprasad S, Feneley MR, Thompson PM. History of prostate cancer treatment. Surg Oncol, 2009,18(3):185-191. [5]Walsh PC, Lepor H, Walsh PC, et al. The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer. Cancer, 1987,60(3 Suppl):526-537. [6]熊子兵,石明,Kunwar Ashok,等. 耻骨后顺行前列腺癌根治术与逆行根治术的围手术期情况和长期并发症比较. 四川大学学报(医学版),2012,43(1):95-98. [7]Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, et al. Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications on early recovery of urinary continence. Eur Urol, 2016,69(3):485-495. [8]Vora AA, Dajani D, Lynch JH, et al. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of urinary function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol, 2013,23 (1):78-87. [9]Hurtes X, Rouprêt M, Vaessen C, et al. Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. BJU Int, 2012,110 (6):875-883. [10]Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2011,59 (1):72-80. [11]Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatec-tomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol, 2001,40 (1):70-74. [12]Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, et al. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol, 2010,58(3):457-461. [13]Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Galfano A, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Critical appraisal of the anatomic landmarks for a complete intrafascial approach. Clin Anat, 2015,28(7):896-902. [14]Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol, 2013,64(6):974-980. [15]Asimakopoulos AD, Corona Montes VE, Gaston R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with intrafascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles and preservation of the pubovesical complex: a step-by-step description of the technique. J Endourol, 2012,26(12):1578-1585. [16]Hoepffner JL, Gaston R, Mugnier C, et al. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Contribution of robotic support, functional and oncological outcomes. Bull Cancer, 2016,103(5):461-468. [17]Pick DL, Lee DI, Skarecky DW, et al. Anatomic guide for port placement for davinci robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2004,18(6):572-575. [18]夏丹,王平,秦杰,等.经腹膜外途径与经腹途径机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术的比较分析.中华泌尿外科杂志,2016,37(3):165-168. [19]Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2015,22(10):916-921. [20]Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology, 2002, 60(5):864-868. [21]Horstmann M. Editorial comment to transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol, 2015,22(10):409-424.
