1Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; 2State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; 3Department of Urology, the 458th Hospital of PLA; 4Department of Urology, Qinzhou First People's Hospital
Abstract：Objective:To explore the applied value of 7-10 cm small incision in radical prostatectomy. Methods:The clinical data of 17 cases of local prostate cancer from May 2013 to Febrary 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All 17 cases of local prostate cancer were subjected to small insicion prostatectomy. The age of 17 cases was 50-71 years old (median 64), tPSA level was 6.8-207.4 μg/L (median 21.8 μg/L), and the incisional length was 7-10 cm. Results:All operations were successfully done. The operative time was 90-180 min (median 110 min), and blood loss was 50-400 mL (median 100 mL). The resection margin in 2 cases was positive, there was one case of urethral anastomotic fistula. During a follow-up period of 3-10 months, there was no biochemical recurrence. Conclusions:The small incision radical prostatectomy has the advantages of low cost, minimal trauma, and reliable effect.
[1]Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 2012, 62(1):10-29. [2]赵平,陈万青,雷正龙,等.前列腺癌.见:赵平/陈万青.2009中国肿瘤登记年报--中国肿瘤登记地区2006年发病死亡.北京:军事医学科学出版社,2009:61. [3]郑涛,陈伟浩,张旭,等.经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术329例报告.临床泌尿外科杂志,2012,27(7):481-484. [4]Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L, et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Urology, 2007, 69(2):311-314. [5]Schlegel PN, Walsh PC. Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function. J Urol, 1987,138(6):1402-1406. [6]Marshall FF, Chan D, Partin AW, et al. Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy: technique and results. J Urol, 1998, 160(6 Pt 2):2440-2445. [7]Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA, et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2):303-313. [8]Okihara K, Kamoi K, Kanazawa M, et al. Transrectal ultrasound navigation during minilaparotomy retropubic radical prostatectomy: impact on positive margin rates and prediction of earlier return to urinary continence. Int J Urol, 2009,16(10):820-825. [9]Steiner MS, Marshall FF. Mini-laparotomy staging pelvic lymphadenectomy (minilap). Alternative to standard and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Urology, 1993, 41(3):201-206. [10]Arai Y, Ishitoya S, Okuba K, et al. Mini-laparotomy staging pelvic lymph node dissection for localized prostate cancer. Int J Urol, 1995, 2(2):121-123. [11]Idom CB Jr, Steiner MS. Minilaparotomy staging pelvic lymphadenectomy follow-up: a safe alternative to standard and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. World J Urol, 1998, 16(6):396-399. [12]LaFontaine P, Chan D, Partin AW, et al. Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy: updated technique and results. Semin Urol Oncol, 2000, 18(1):19-27. [13]Nomura T, Mimata H, Kitamura H, et al. Lower incidence of inguinal hernia: minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy compared with conventional technique. A preliminary report. Urol Int, 2005, 74(1):32-37. [14]Kiyokawa H, Kato H. Radical retropubic prostatectomy through a minimal incision with portless endoscopy: our initial experience. Int J Urol, 2006, 13(1):7-9. [15]Eden CG, Neill MG, Louie-Johnsun MW. The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'. BJU Int, 2009,103(9):1224-1230. [16]Slabaugh TK Jr, Marshall FF. A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol, 2004, 172(6 Pt 2):2545-2548.
