注册 登录 联系我们  
微创泌尿外科杂志  2021, Vol. 10 Issue (5): 304-311    DOI: 10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2021.05.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
体外物理振动排石用于辅助体外震波碎石/逆行输尿管软镜碎石术后排石疗效的荟萃分析
李强1, 许长宝1, 赵兴华1, 李武学1, 王若凡1
1郑州大学第二附属医院泌尿外科 450000 郑州
The efficacy of external physical vibration lithecbolein assistant treatment of residual stonesafter ESWL/RIRS: a meta-analysis
LI Qiang1, XU Changbao1, ZHAO Xinghua1, LI Wuxue1, WANG Ruofan1
1Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014,China
全文: PDF (3434 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的:系统评价体外物理振动排石 (EPVL)辅助体外震波碎石(ESWL)或逆行输尿管软镜碎石(RIRS)术后排石的有效性与安全性,并进一步探讨其用于术后排石的最佳时机。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、万方、维普、中国知网及中国生物医学文献在线数据库,收集有关EPVL辅助术后排石的随机对照试验(RCTs)。由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选和资料提取,然后参照Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对纳入文献进行质量评价,采用RevMan5.3软件进行meta分析。结果:最终纳入7篇RCTs,共计946例患者,EPVL组463例,自然排石组483例。Meta分析结果提示,排石治疗后各时期,EPVL组的结石清除率(SFR)均明显高于自然排石组、RIRS亚组,排石治疗后3~5周,EPVL组的尿白细胞阳性率和血尿发生率均明显低于自然排石组。结论:EPVL用于辅助ESWL/RIRS术后排石,能够显著提高清石率,减少术后并发症。为获得较高SFR,减少术后并发症,同时避免过度医疗,我们推荐ESWL/RIRS术后1周根据结石排出情况,对患者辅以EPVL治疗。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李强
许长宝
赵兴华
李武学
王若凡
关键词 肾结石术后残石体外物理振动排石荟萃分析    
AbstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL)in assistant treatment of residual stones after ESWL/RIRS by meta-analysis, and to explorethe best operation time. Methods: Several online databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and Wanfang were searched to collect the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EPVL with the conventional treatmentafter ESWL/RIRS. The data were screened and extracted by two independent reviewers respectively, and the quality of the included articles was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Then the meta-analysis was conducted with the software of Revman 5.3. Results: 7 RCTs were obtained with 946 cases including the treatment group (n =463) and the control group (n = 483). The results of meta-analysis showed that the stone-free rate (SFR) ofthe treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group at each period after lithotripsy. In RIRS subgroup, 3-5 weeks after lithotripsy, the positive rate of urinary leukocyte and hematuria in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group. Conclusion: EPVL is used to assist the removal of stones after ESWL/RIRS, which can significantly improve the SFR and reduce postoperative complications. In order to obtain higher SFR, reduce postoperative complications and avoid excessive medical treatment, we recommend that one week after ESWL/RIRS, EPVL should be used to treat the patients according to the stone excretion.
Key wordskidney stone    the residual stone    external physical vibration lithecbole    meta-analysis
收稿日期: 2021-03-31     
基金资助:河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(LHGJ20190322)
通讯作者: 赵兴华,xiaoxin2199@126.com   
引用本文:   
李强, 许长宝, 赵兴华, 李武学, 王若凡. 体外物理振动排石用于辅助体外震波碎石/逆行输尿管软镜碎石术后排石疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 10(5): 304-311.
LI Qiang, XU Changbao, ZHAO Xinghua, LI Wuxue, WANG Ruofan. The efficacy of external physical vibration lithecbolein assistant treatment of residual stonesafter ESWL/RIRS: a meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2021, 10(5): 304-311.
链接本文:  
http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract1701.shtml     或     http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2021/V10/I5/304
京ICP备14007602 版权所有 © 微创泌尿外科杂志 地址:北京市复兴路28号 邮编:100853
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn