Abstract：Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Sotn ureterorenoscope and ureteroscopy in the treatment of unilateral ureteral calculi. Methods: The clinical data of 118 patients with unilateral ureteral calculi admitted to Enshi Central Hospital from February 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 58 cases in the Sotn ureterorenoscope group and 60 cases in the ureteroscopy group.Compare two groups of operation time, postoperative hospitalization days and cost of treatment,stone removal rate of 1 month after operation,a period into the mirror failure rate, Incidence of stage Ⅱ lithotripsy,the incidence of postoperative fever, ureteral injury incidence rate.Patients were divided into upper ureteral segment and middle and lower ureteral segment for subgroup analysis according to different calculi locations. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, stone removal rate of 1 month after operation （P<0.05）.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative hospital days, treatment costs,a period into the mirror failure rate, Incidence of stage Ⅱ lithotripsy, the incidence of postoperative fever, ureteral injury incidence rate（P>0.05）.For upper ureteral calculi, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, stone removal rate of 1 month after operation （P<0.05）.There was no significant difference in the incidence of fever and ureteral injury between the two groups （P>0.05）.For middle and lower ureteral calculi, the difference in operation time between the two groups was statistically significant （P<0.05）.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in stone removal rate of 1 month after operation,incidence of postoperative fever and incidence of ureteral injury （P>0.05）. Conclusion: The treatment of unilateral ureteral calculi by both Sotn ureterorenoscope and ureteroscopy is safe and effective.Compared with ureteroscopy, Sotn ureterorenoscope had shorter operative time and higher SFR in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi.
罗钦瑞, 陈洪波, 胡晓晖, 兰勇, 程武松. 硕通镜与输尿管镜治疗单侧输尿管结石的临床对比研究[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 10(5): 299-303.
LUO Qinrui, CHEN Hongbo, HU Xiaohui, LAN Yong, CHENG Wusong. A comparative study on the treatment of unilateral ureteral calculi by sotn ureterorenoscope and ureteroscopy. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2021, 10(5): 299-303.
[1] 叶章群,刘浩然.泌尿系结石的诊断治疗进展.临床外科杂志,2017,25(2):85-88. [2] ZENG G, MAI Z, XIA S, et al.Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study. BJU Int,2017,120(1):109-116. [3] 付猛,胡卫国,李建兴.输尿管镜碎石取石术安全共识.现代泌尿外科杂志,2020,25(5):385-391. [4] 那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南手册:2014版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 129-165. [5] 韩帅红,张旭辉,张彬,等.改良输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石疗效观察.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(5):336-339. [6] Mogilevkin Y, Sofer M, Margel D, et al.Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. J Endourol,2014,28(12):1414-1417. [7] 屈维龙,汪益民,尤志新.N-Trap拦截网篮或封堵器和无封堵装置应用于输尿管上段结石手术的效果比较.国际泌尿系统杂志,2018,38(5):708-711. [8] 李保安,何长海,赵琪. NTrap阻石网篮与封堵器在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石中的应用比较.现代泌尿外科杂志,2018,23(1):30-33. [9] 王树声,翁湘涛,周均洪,等.硕通镜治疗上尿路结石的有效性与安全性.中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(9):671-674. [10] 甘澍,周均洪,廖芝健,等.负压组合镜治疗肾结石的临床观察.临床外科杂志,2017,25(2):104-106. [11] 熊波波,张劲松,李宁,等.硕通镜和输尿管镜钬激光在输尿管上段感染性结石疗效对比.临床泌尿外科杂志,2020,35(7):566-570. [12] 向小龙,兰勇,胡晓晖,等.硕通镜与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的疗效对比.中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(7):124-126. [13] 罗生军,袁野,胡豪,等. 硕通镜与输尿管软镜治疗单侧上尿路结石的效果分析.第三军医大学学报,2019,41(21):2101-2106. [14] 钟文,赖贺,赵志健,等.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术后全身炎症反应综合征的风险因素评估.临床泌尿外科杂志,2016,31(3):243-246. [15] 熊波波,张劲松,李宁,等. STL、FURSL治疗体外冲击波碎石术失败的输尿管上段结石对比观察.山东医药,2020,60(12):56-58. [16] 陈勇,蒋昌毅,柯昌兴,等.硕通镜治疗合并尿路感染的输尿管上段结石的疗效分析.临床泌尿外科杂志,2020,35(3):192-195. [17] LI K, LIAO Z, LIN T, et al.A novel semirigid ureterorenoscope with vacuum suctioning system for management of single proximal ureteral and renal pelvic stones: an initial experience. J Endourol,2018,32(12):1154-1159.
