注册 登录 联系我们  
微创泌尿外科杂志  2013, Vol. 2 Issue (6): 384-390    
  临床研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经输尿管软镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术在肾结石治疗方面的Meta分析
杨广修1, , 武进峰1, 付永强1, 康云鹏1, 张鑫1
1山西医科大学附属大医院泌尿外科 030001 太原
Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with renal calculus:a Meta-analysis
Yang Guangxiu1, Wu Jinfeng1, Fu Yongqiang1, Kang Yunpeng1, Zhang Xin1
1Department of Urinary Surgery,The Big Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan, 030001, China
全文: PDF (7394 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的:系统评价经输尿管软镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术在肾结石治疗方面的安全性、疗效。方法:计算机检索 PUBMED,CNKI, sciencedirect, Ovid,EBSCO,CBM等相关的数据库,查找2003~2013年公开发表的文献资料,使用Revman 5.2软件完成Meta分析。结果:对最后纳入的11篇文献进行Meta分析,经输尿管软镜取石术组的结石清除率低于经皮肾镜取石术组[OR=0.51, 95%CI(0.36, 0.72),P=0.000 2], 而在手术时间[MD=17.06, 95%CI(2.94, 31.18),P=0.02],住院时间[MD=-1.51,(-1.98,-1.03),P<0.000 01],术后出血[OR=0.31, 95%CI(0.05, 1.93),P=0.21],术后发热[OR=1.35, 95%CI(0.51, 3.52),P=0.54],术后漏尿[OR=0.26, 95%CI(0.03, 2.45),P=0.24]方面优于经皮肾镜取石术。结论:根据结果显示:经输尿管软镜取石术在治疗肾结石方面安全、可靠,与经皮肾镜取石术相比,在避免并发症方面有一定优势。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 经输尿管软镜取石术 经皮肾镜取石术 肾结石 Meta分析    
AbstractObjective:To assess and compare the security, efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) and Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL). Methods:We searched PubMed, CNKI, ScineceDirect, Ovid, EBSCO, CBM and collected relevant literature published beteen 2003-2012. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.2 software. Results:Eleven non-randomized controlled trials were inclued. The results of meta-analysis showed that PCNL was better than FURL in stones clearance (OR=0.51, 95%CI[0.36, 0.72], P=0.000 2), But FURL was better the Mean operative time (MD=17.06, 95%CI[2.94, 31.18], P=0.02), the duration of hospitalization(MD=-1.51, [-1.98,-1.03], P<0.000 01), the postoperative bleeding (OR=0.31, 95%CI[0.05, 1.93], P=0.21), the postoperative pyrexia (OR=1.35, 95%CI[0.51, 3.52], P=0.54), the postoperative leakage of urine (OR=0.26, 95%CI[0.03, 2.45], P=0.24). Conclusions:Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy is safe,compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, this surgery has some advantages on avoiding compliactions.
Key wordsflexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy    percutaneous nephrolithotomy    renal calculus    Meta-analysis
收稿日期: 2013-09-08     
ZTFLH:  R692  
通讯作者: 武进峰,wujf005@126.com   
引用本文:   
杨广修, , 武进峰, 付永强, 康云鹏, 张鑫. 经输尿管软镜取石术与经皮肾镜取石术在肾结石治疗方面的Meta分析[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(6): 384-390.
Yang Guangxiu, Wu Jinfeng, Fu Yongqiang, Kang Yunpeng, Zhang Xin. Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with renal calculus:a Meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGY, 2013, 2(6): 384-390.
链接本文:  
http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/abstract/abstract1078.shtml     或     http://journal20.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_zgmnwk/CN/Y2013/V2/I6/384
京ICP备14007602 版权所有 © 微创泌尿外科杂志 地址:北京市复兴路28号 邮编:100853
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn