Male circumcision (MC) can reduce HIV transmission through heterosexual intercourse by 60% and is therefore recommended as an important strategy for HIV prevention by WHO and UNAIDS. Several observational and epidemiological studies have also demonstrated significant reduction in the risk of human papillomavirus, herpes simplex virus 2 as well as the incidence of other sexual transmitted infections and prostate cancer with male circumcision, providing long-term healthy benefits for both men and women. However, the long term benefits and the acceptability of MC are currently underestimated in China. Recently, accumulated evidence shows that the ShangRing device for simplified adult circumcision may play an important role in preventing HIV transmission and promoting reproductive health for both men and women in China.

男性包皮环切能显著降低60%男性阴茎-阴道性交获得性HIV感染风险,被WHO和联合国艾滋病规划署推荐为HIV预防策略中的一个重要干预措施。越来越多的研究已经证实,男性包皮环切也能降低人乳头瘤病毒、单纯疱疹病毒2型和其他性传播疾病感染风险,降低前列腺癌风险,为男女性生殖健康提供长远的益处。然而,男性包皮环切对促进两性生殖健康的长远益处与可接受性在中国一直被低估。最近累积的研究证据提示,男性包皮环切术, 特别是应用创新的男性包皮环切术,例如中国商环将在HIV预防和促进人类生殖健康中发挥十分重要的作用,本文即对上述问题进行阐述。

目的比较一次性包皮环切吻合器与传统环切术治疗成人包皮过长及包茎的临床疗效和并发症。方法对2012年2月至2014年2月于我院行包皮手术的成人患者共118例进行观察,其中69例采用一次性包皮环切吻合器,49例采用传统包皮环切术,对2组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛程度、愈合时间、水肿时间、外观满意度、术后并发症等进行统计学分析。结果一次性包皮环切吻合器组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛程度和水肿时间明显低于传统包皮环切术组(P0.05),术后并发症也明显减低(P0.05)。结论一次性包皮环切吻合器较传统环切术手术时间短、操作简单、术中出血少、痛苦小、外观满意度高、并发症少,值得临床推广应用。

目的 对比分析中国商环包皮环切术和传统包皮环切术的疗效和手术并发症.方法 有完整随访资料的479例中国商环包皮环切术患者和354例传统包皮环切术患者,两组患者年龄、包皮情况比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).对比分析其手术时间、疼痛评分、失血量、术后并发症、术后外观满意情况、伤口愈合时间、治疗费用等.结果 商环组和传统手术组手术时间分别为(5±1)、(27±5)min;出血量分别为(0.98±1.14)、(8.30±3.60)ml;手术时疼痛评分分别为0.25±0.54、3.29±1.57;术后24 h疼痛评分分别为1.63±0.87、5.56±1.42;术后并发症发生率分别为6.89%(33/479)、13.28%(47/354);创口愈合时间分别为(20±5)、(13±2)d;外观满意率分别为99.79%(478/479)、92.37%(327/354);治疗费用分别为(871±52)、(554±46)元.与传统手术组相比,商环组手术时间短,失血量少,患者痛苦小,外观满意率高,并发症发生率低(P＜0.05).但商环组创口愈合时间较长,治疗费用较高(P＜0.05).结论 用中国商环行包皮环切术是对传统包皮环切术的简化和改进,具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、疼痛轻、术后外观满意度高、患者易于接受等优点. Abstract： Objective To compare the efficacy and complications of Chinese Shang Ring circumcision with conventional circumcisiom Methods Clinical data of 479 cases of Chinese Shang Ring circumcision and 354 cases of conventional circumcision with complete follow-up were analyzed.Comparisons were made between the two groups on operation time,pain score,blood loss,postoperative complications,postoperative satisfaction with penile appearance,wound healing time and treatment costs. Results There was no statistical difference in age and foreskin status between the two groups (P＞0.05).For the Shang Ring group,the operation time was(5±1)rain,blood loss was (0.98±1.14)ml,pain score during operation was 0.25±0.54,24-hour pain score after operation was 1.63±0.87,the postoperative complication rate was 6.89% (33/479),wound healing time was (20±5)d,the satisfaction rate of appearance was 99.79% (478/479),and treatment cost was (871±52) yuan.For the conventional group,the operation time was (27±5) min,blood loss was (8.30±3.60)ml,pain score during operation was 3.29±1.57,24-hour pain score after operation was 5.56±1.42,the postoperative complication rate was 13.28%(47/354),wound healing time was (13±2)d,satisfaction rate of appearance was 92.37% (327/354),and treatment cost was (554±46) yuan.Compared with the conventional group,the Shang Ring group had a shorter operation time,less blood loss,less pain score,higher appearance satisfaction rate and a lower complication rate (P＜0.05).But wound healing time was longer and treatment cost was higher in the Shang Ring group (P＜0.05). Conclusions Chinese Shang Ring circumcision is simpler and an improved approach over conventional circumeision with shorter operative time,less blood loss,less pain,relatively lower complication rate and higher satisfaction and acceptability.

目的对比内环外置法与内环内置法中国商环包皮环切术的临床效果。方法将100例需行包皮环切术者随机分为内环外置组及内环内置组,每组50例,两组均采用中国商环行包皮环切术,内环内置组将内环置于包皮腔内,外环放置包皮外板外;内环外置组将内环置于包皮外板外,即标准化中国商环包皮环切术。对比两组手术时间、视觉模拟评分、切口愈合时间、术后并发症、切口愈合满意率。结果与内环外置组比较,内环内置组脱环时疼痛评分低,切口愈合时间短(P均0.05),术后水肿、切口裂开发生率低,切口满意率高(P均0.05)。结论内环内置法中国商环包皮环切术具有效果好、脱环疼痛轻、术后并发症发生率低、愈合时间短、外观满意率高等优点。